I mentioned in my recommendations for August having read and been thoroughly dismayed by a recent Irish Times article, ‘If ever you go to Dublin town’. In it, Rosita Boland reports that Dublin ‘might be a Unesco City of Literature with a rich literary history to be proud of’, but Irish visitors, locals, and tourists alike all seem a bit uninterested and uninformed about this history. One Texan tourist calling herself ‘just a clueless American’, for instance, said that she couldn’t actually name ‘any writers or books from Ireland, let alone from Dublin’. Others echoed her response with heart-wrenching regularity.
Boland’s unofficial experiment doesn’t bode well for Dublin’s new status as Unesco City of Literature. Dublin was awarded the designation – one of only four such honours – after a three-year long process headed by Dublin City Council under the auspices of Unesco’s Creative Cities Network. Other cities that already boast the ‘Unesco City of Literature’ title include Edinburgh, Melbourne, and Iowa, but what exactly does this mean for the cities involved? Reporting on Dublin City Council’s bid for ‘city of literature’ status in March 2009, Irish Times writer Charlie Taylor suggested that it all comes down to the tourism industry. As Taylor then wrote, ‘According to estimates, landing the prestigious recognition in 2004 has generated about £2.2m per annum for Edinburgh and an additional £2.1m for the rest of Scotland’. In her comments upon the award of the designation on 27 July 2010, Minister for Culture Mary Hanafin suggested the same; the designation was, she said, ‘a great recognition of the vast literary wealth for which we are renowned and will be a welcome boost for cultural tourism’. Novelist Jopseph O’Connor’s comment that the designation ‘might bring in the odd tourist’ seems more accurate, however, if Boland’s brief questioning is anything to go by.
One of the requirements to be designated a city of literature, as listed on the Creative Cities Network website, is that the city boast an ‘Urban environment in which literature, drama and/or poetry play an integral role’. In tourism terms, this is probably best represented by the likes of the Dublin Literary Pub Crawl (reviewed here late last month), the Dublin Writers’ Museum, and the self-guided Literary Walking Tour of Gothic Dublin. The extent to which these efforts to heighten Irish literature’s place in the minds of tourists succeed is questionable, however, if we consider the echoed remarks of a couple of tourists recorded by Boland. One from the US and the other from Austria, these visitors wanted to be able to take tours ‘of famous Irish authors’ houses’ and to ‘visit birthplaces of writers’ – missing the fact that such opportunities are already largely available via, for instance, the George Bernard Shaw Birthplace (open to the public) on 33 Synge Street, Dublin Tourism’s iWalk series , and the James Joyce Museum in Sandycove.
Evening Herald writer Sinead Ryan hit the nail on the head when she wrote on 28 July 2010 that not only do we need ‘to grasp this wordy honour by the throat and rattle it for all it’s worth, [or] it will just pass into insignificance’, we also have ‘to find an alternative for tourists to the literary pub crawl’. Noting that ‘A Google search will give a smattering of writers’ workshops, the odd poetry reading and a handful of library festivals in the city’, Ryan presses for more, including tax breaks for writers, more funding for libraries and creative writing classes in schools, and increased commissioning of literary projects. Her best idea, however, as far as I’m concerned is ‘a writers’ forum [including ‘readers’ and ‘wannabes’ as well] to submit ideas to Government’. Count me in! This is, as Ryan rightly notes, an opportunity that should not and, in the light of the literary blanks noted by Boland, cannot be missed.
Tags: City of Culture, Dublin, Irish Times, Irish writers, Unesco
16 August 2010 at 09:48 |
At the risk of pointing out the obvious, writers do still fall under the Artists’ Exemption (for now, anyway) and most aren’t making enough from their art to be taxed anyway… (http://www.ireland-writers.com/NewsB.htm#work – and that includes money made from speaking and teaching too, which inflates the figures)
There’s actually quite a lot of creative/writer-y things on in Dublin but there’s no centralised information about any of it – that’s one of the problems. There are things like the Children’s Book Festival and Writers In Schools programme, which bring writers to schools and libraries for either one visit or several; there’s the Write A Book programme for schools also; there are plenty of festivals; there are storytelling nights and readings and workshops and summer camps… but you have to look for them. There’s a set of writing workshops which specifically target American visitors and are virtually unknown here, rather than there being links between local arts organisations and tourism boards. To be fair, a grant has already been given to someone to set up this centralised hub (it’ll live at http://www.writing.ie/), so there is movement on that front. But right now it’s quite easy for a lot of what’s going on to fall through the cracks, which is a pity.
16 August 2010 at 15:38 |
Maybe the problem is a lack of marketing. A quick look on DiscoverIreland.ie showed plenty of literary themed attractions around the country but nothing Dublin-specific, or indeed anything related to Dublin’s new UNESCO status.
To add to the list of worthy places to visit in Dublin with a literary connection – you can’t do much worse than St. Patrick’s Cathedral given it’s own historic importance and it’s connection with Swift.
Perhaps we should have a Wilde Museum, ideally on Merrion Square (which may soon see ‘Archbishop Ryan Park’ renamed ‘Oscar Wide Gardens’). In relation to the photo chosen for the blog piece, does anyone else think it’s peculiar that Wilde’s plaque is in two languages? Not that it’s bilingual, that it uses English and Irish for different things.
16 August 2010 at 17:00 |
I did think that was a bit odd, Fintan, but not being an Irish speaker myself, I wasn’t sure of the significance. I chose the picture for a couple of reasons: 1. it was on wikimedia commons and therefore wouldn’t be covered by copyright; 2. because plaques like this one are all over the place in Dublin marking birth places, death sites, etc., but don’t receive, as you suggest, the kind of marketing necessary to make them readily identifiable by tourists.
9 September 2010 at 07:31 |
[…] crisis in arts funding as well as an obvious need to battle cultural ignorance of Irish literature, if the blank stares greeting the recent award of UNESCO City of Literature to Dublin are anything to…, The Dublin Review’s tenth birthday is a reminder of the importance of supporting Irish writers […]
16 June 2012 at 11:36 |
Nice post. I was checking continuously this blog and I’m impressed! Extremely helpful information specially the final phase 🙂 I handle such info much. I was seeking this certain information for a long time. Thanks and good luck.
5 August 2012 at 10:25 |
Hi there! Someone in my Facebook group shared this site with us so I came to look it over.
I’m definitely loving the information. I’m bookmarking and will be
tweeting this to my followers! Excellent blog and superb style and design.
30 May 2013 at 15:51 |
After the surgery, a tiny incision is made and a telescope like divide
is entered into the body, for example, starting periods at a young age makes autoimmune more likely.
Oily fish contains omega-3 fatty acids which help to maintain a optimum functioning liver.
Finally, if you can’t seem to get passed it. I had the surgery in Feb 2007 and by Oct 2008 I was pregnant with him and a normal one.